Many design firms initially adopt project-based BIM applications as a way to promote BIM within their organizations. In recent years, most have taken this further by establishing dedicated BIM teams or departments. Some firms even aim for their BIM departments to possess independent external business capabilities. However, despite the technical strengths of BIM teams, they often struggle to address the broader challenges design firms face during BIM adoption. These challenges include the need to redesign workflows, inadequate evaluation mechanisms, and the lack of enterprise-wide implementation standards and supporting resources.
As a result, BIM teams typically mitigate risks only within a limited scope. This constrained impact not only limits the overall promotion of BIM but also undermines the confidence of enterprises in adopting BIM due to the difficulties encountered.
It is clear that the intention behind forming a BIM team in a design firm is to “lead by example” through pilot projects. Unfortunately, failures at this pilot stage often erode confidence in wider adoption efforts. Within design companies, the overlap and similarity between pilot projects (“points”) and broader implementation (“surfaces”) complicate the leadership role of these pilot initiatives. When too much emphasis is placed on promotion, it can hinder experimentation, and vice versa.
Therefore, relying solely on project-based BIM applications is insufficient for design firms. While applying BIM within projects is an essential component of enterprise BIM promotion, it is neither comprehensive nor the foundation for fully transforming firms into BIM-driven design models. External BIM support can accelerate BIM adoption, but it cannot substitute for firms’ own strategic planning that aligns BIM deployment with their business goals and development needs, which is critical for achieving a complete transformation.
In summary, design firms face the following limitations when applying BIM solely at the project level:
1. Without established BIM standards in their strategic planning, firms often assemble only a group of BIM tool experts at the project level, which makes it difficult to develop true core competencies at the enterprise level.
2. Project-focused BIM teams often lack a strong sense of corporate responsibility, which limits their ability to consider BIM application from the perspective of enterprise value creation.
3. Long-term
Must log in before commenting!
Sign Up