BIM Q&A | Is Rhino a Software Dominated by “Sassy Operations”?
First of all, I want to clarify that I am not an expert—just a beginner who has learned the basic functions of Rhino. The reason I’m asking this question is to figure out whether I should continue investing time in learning this software.
At the beginning, building a model in Rhino is straightforward. However, as the model nears completion, it increasingly requires some “fancy tricks” to finish properly. For example, chamfering with a circular tube is almost a standard operation for Rhino users. Honestly, in many of my models, at least one-third of the connections involve chamfering using circular tubes.
Another example is changing units. Have you seen this kind of operation in other software? Rhino users often increase and then decrease units midway through a drawing as a routine step.
When it comes to extracting complex shells, it becomes really challenging to create a smooth, stylish surface. Sometimes, the shell you end up with looks strange, and editing it can be very frustrating. Many times, a model might seem almost finished in just half an hour, but unexpected issues arise that can delay the process for another day.
For instance, the problem I faced yesterday was with chamfering. The usual chamfering didn’t work, and neither could I cut round pipes. I understand this happened because some faces overlapped or had gaps. However, even when creating a slightly complex model based purely on data modeling, it’s hard to guarantee perfection. A small error can trigger a chain reaction, turning your final model into a compromise rather than the ideal result.
Since my software knowledge is limited, I wonder if this is common for all 3D applications or if it’s just because I am not proficient enough yet. Would Alias be a better alternative?
Must log in before commenting!
Sign Up