A Brief Discussion on BIM Education, Training, and Reflections
One of the most prominent topics in 2019 has been BIM Education, alongside discussions on performance benefits and related disputes. This topic spans various sectors, including owner education (especially within government departments), industry education (covering both internal and vocational training within companies), and university technical education. It also touches on education and training certifications, talent certifications, and even project certification issues. After engaging with numerous organizations, experts, and scholars, several key points are worth considering:
1. Many organizations now realize that over half of BIM’s effectiveness stems from professional knowledge and experience. This includes expertise in development planning, architectural/structural/MEP design, green energy analysis, obtaining building permits, detailed design, construction drawings, construction labor safety and quality management, construction planning and interface reviews, as well as operation and maintenance management.
The other part lies in understanding BIM concepts and systems, such as establishing BIM-related procurement contracts, execution and information delivery plans, and grasping standards like PAS-1192, ISO-19650, OIR/EIR/PIR/AIR, CDE, IFC, and COBie specifications.
Finally, there is software operation—tools like Revit, ArchiCAD, Tekla, and others. However, in education, training, and certification programs, the majority focus primarily on software skills, often neglecting the first two critical aspects. This leads to a common misconception that “knowing how to operate BIM software equals knowing how to perform collision detection.” (Collision detection is cited because there is often a significant gap between software-identified clashes and actual meaningful conflicts in practice.) Many companies invest heavily in hiring employees proficient with BIM software, but in reality, these employees often use BIM merely for 3D modeling. Consequently, BIM is sometimes reduced to “flashy 3D visuals,” which puts employees under scrutiny for not delivering expected results, despite the high costs of BIM implementation.
2. BIM model creation is fundamentally an information construction process—essentially building a digital twin of a building. This process is coupled with complex (and sometimes not yet fully smart) software functionalities. Even when using the same software, modeling methods vary across different stages of design, construction, and operation. Within the same company, modeling processes and methods often differ depending on internal organizational workflows or specific projects.
In the BIM world, the time and cost involved in troubleshooting models can be far greater than getting the process right from the start. Therefore, the modeling process and the interpretation of information (based on experience) are essential for BIM quality control and risk management.
Moreover, BIM serves as an information integration tool, where the effectiveness of platform and team collaboration greatly outweighs individual effort. There is no single “correct” software usage process. For some companies, starting fresh with BIM software (as a blank slate) can be easier than adapting to previously learned methods. Practical experience often proves more valuable than theoretical knowledge. As a result, many companies develop their own internal training methods. However, these successful experiences create a risk where well-trained talent may be poached by competitors.
3. In university technical education, BIM represents a new digital approach to management and systems, as well as a highly practical tool. However, students often lack the foundational knowledge to fully grasp BIM concepts, and integrating BIM into existing courses is challenging. Few instructors are able to combine BIM theory and practical application into a cohesive teaching framework. It is even harder to nurture BIM professionals with competitive industry skills within academic settings.
A more feasible approach is to gradually introduce the concept of BIM into existing disciplines, then guide students towards software operation skills.
4. Lastly, and most importantly, there is owner education. Over the past decade, government promotion and research have driven both public and private sectors to hope for BIM’s theoretical benefits. Yet, after ten years, most remain stuck at the stage of “paying for a model they don’t know how to use.” This raises questions: Should funds be allocated for BIM? How can such spending be justified? Does the project truly require BIM?
When these questions arise, stakeholders begin to review BIM procurement and its effectiveness, leading to adjustments and improvements. However, the issue circles back to the first point: owners must be capable of analyzing and recognizing the challenges faced in construction projects or enterprises, and manage these effectively. Based on this understanding, they can evaluate which BIM solutions will best assist in problem-solving. Only then can they establish procurement and contracting strategies, agreements, and requirements with reasonable costs and acceptance criteria.
When most executing units have only a partial understanding, correct BIM concepts and strategies are essential to guide BIM implementation and ultimately produce usable models that solve real problems.
There are ongoing discussions about course requirements, grading, content, and training institutions. Looking at the development in other countries, BIM is still a relatively new concept and technology. Therefore, “trial and error learning remains the norm, and continuous adjustments are inevitable,” which provides room for improvement.
The points above are shared for your reference. That concludes this Brief Discussion on BIM Education, Training, and Reflections. I hope this article proves helpful to everyone!
Must log in before commenting!
Sign Up