Today, I will discuss the development of BIM technology.
The Concept of BIM
Research on BIM began in the late 1970s. Around 1985, with the launch of the ISO STEP standardization project, BIM gained new opportunities for growth. STEP is an international information exchange standard representing product modules, aimed at addressing the need for extensive data exchange in the manufacturing industry. Early efforts in STEP standardization included global AEC (Architecture, Engineering, and Construction) reference models and building system models.
Some scholars view BIM as a broad field that encompasses structural engineering, construction, and building operations. It also represents a set of methodologies that integrate the entire building strategy, processes, and technological interactions to create digital formats. These formats enable the management of essential building design and engineering information throughout a building’s entire lifecycle. Moreover, BIM serves as an interoperable and reusable tool for generating and managing construction information. Throughout a building’s lifecycle, users can integrate and reuse building information and domain knowledge efficiently.
In the mid-1990s, the International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI), now known as buildingSMART, took over the standardization of product models in architecture. The first version of the Industry Foundation Classes (IFCs) was released in 1997. Recognizing the importance of standardizing and managing BIM adoption, research into key IT construction standardization plans began. Experts highlight that initial efforts focused on the ISO 13567 standard for CAD drawings, which addresses the naming conventions for systems and CAD layers. Subsequently, collaborative modeling of higher-level building information became the focus, with special reference to IAI’s IFCs.
Experts note that there is considerable debate among authors and analysts regarding many existing professional terms related to BIM. However, many support adopting the term “BIM,” largely because major CAD developers have embraced it. Some researchers attempt to distinguish between various professional terms, but significant overlap in their scopes challenges the uniqueness of these terms. These terms often originate from research or industry bodies, as well as software developers. Although these efforts may not directly benefit industry stakeholders, the foundational knowledge and computational structures conveyed by these terms have transitioned from research institutions into the industrial sector. BIM continues to evolve, spreading widely across both industry and academia. To explore BIM in different fields, its knowledge components need to be clearly defined and its boundaries expanded.
At numerous conferences, seminars, and related events, BIM is widely regarded as a catalyst for reducing industry fragmentation, improving efficiency and effectiveness, and lowering the high costs associated with interoperability. These views draw heavily from organizational research, information systems, and management disciplines. This diversity of perspectives highlights the existing gaps in knowledge and the need for organizing domain knowledge via a structured research architecture. In other words, a systematic BIM domain study is essential.
Furthermore, a fully defined BIM architecture is necessary to enhance knowledge retrieval and organization. This would benefit practitioners and educators by providing clear frameworks for planning and segmentation within the BIM field. Using current data and parameters in management to create structural subdivisions can facilitate understanding, promote adoption, and support gradual implementation. There is also a critical architectural need to position BIM as an integration of products and simulation operations, rather than merely a collection of disparate technologies and processes.
Finally, there remains a gap between academic and industrial perspectives on BIM. Bridging this divide requires a research and communication framework that addresses their complementary and specific needs.
That concludes today’s discussion on the development of BIM technology. Currently, the international implementation and dialogue around BIM are steadily increasing. More organizations and national institutions are recognizing its potential to add value. This is evident in the rapid emergence of guidelines and reports focused on exploring and defining BIM’s requirements and capabilities. While these documents are valuable, they often lack a comprehensive, systematic survey infrastructure tailored to the BIM field.
Must log in before commenting!
Sign Up