Enterprises can select BIM software and service providers based on two main criteria.
The first criterion is value for money. Evaluating the quality of software and services depends primarily on their actual application within a project. It is not about the number or reputation of past projects, but rather the depth and effectiveness of BIM implementation. The use of BIM in construction companies varies significantly—from bidding stages to the entire construction process, and from mere presentation and promotion to daily practical work. Determining whether a solution is cost-effective involves comparing prices from multiple providers alongside their respective plans and quotes. Implementing BIM does not necessarily require a large budget, especially not for modeling. If the enterprise’s information center can handle modeling internally, it can save substantial costs while also enabling the company to promote BIM on a larger scale.
The second criterion is the ability to rapidly develop the company’s BIM capabilities. These capabilities include modeling skills, standards development, software proficiency, and implementation expertise. After collaborating with a third-party software or service provider on one or two projects, a company typically gains the necessary BIM skills to apply the technology effectively and in depth.
As the saying goes, “Only by swimming in the river can one know the depth of the water.” The author encourages more construction firms to adopt a rational and thoughtful approach, experimenting with BIM at a lower cost. By doing so, they can truly experience the benefits of BIM, improve project and enterprise management, increase revenue, reduce costs, and ultimately strengthen their core competitiveness.
Must log in before commenting!
Sign Up